|
Recently I have wondered if it is possible to calculate the
probability of winning a poker tournament based on which strategy you
use and how your all in moves are distributed. In this article I will
share with you my findings. Hope you have the patience to read it all
the way through:-). The table below (the culmination of way too many
hours of research) is a teaser of what is ahead if you continue reading.
| Duration [hours] |
Reference
win rate
[1 out of ..]
|
On a roll
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
Coinflip
win rate
[1 out of ..]
|
Underdog
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
Realistic
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
| 1 |
9 |
2 |
8
|
37
|
na
|
| 2 |
60 |
3 |
32
|
412
|
16
|
| 3 |
140 |
4 |
64
|
1372
|
28
|
| 4 |
340 |
5 |
128
|
4572
|
50
|
| 5 |
680 |
6 |
256
|
15242
|
87
|
| 6 |
1110 |
7 |
512
|
50805
|
152
|
Check out the previous post in this series:
Just to remind you, in my first post in this series I discovered an
exponential relationship between the time an online freezeout
tournament has been running and the percentage of players exited from
the tournament. This enabled me to estimate both the time needed to
reach the final table of a tournament given the number of players
registered and what size tournament you should choose given the time
you have available to play.
I needed this relationship to be able to estimate the number of
players entering a tournament of a given duration and thus the total
amount of chips in play. Once I know the total amount of chips in play
is known, I can calculate the number of successive all in wins needed
to win all the chips in the tournament. Finally, the last step in my
calculations will be to set up different all in probability
distributions to end up with the probability of winning an online poker
tournament. Confused? Don’t worry:-) I will guide you through my
calculations step by step in the remainder of this article. If you
don’t like math, simply scroll down to the final table where I
summarize my most important findings.
The table below summarizes the total amount of chips in play for
different tournament durations and the successive all ins you will need
to win to win the tournament:
| Tournament duration [hours] |
Number of Players |
Total Chips in play (starting stack 1500) |
Successive all ins needed to win (rounded numbers) |
| 1 |
9 |
13500 |
3
|
| 2 |
60 |
90000 |
6
|
| 3 |
140 |
210000 |
7
|
| 4 |
340 |
510000 |
8
|
| 5 |
680 |
1020000 |
9
|
| 6 |
1110 |
1665000 |
10
|
Again, in order to keep things simple I assumed that each all in
would double the 1500 chip starting stack. According to this
assumption, 2 successive all in wins will increase your stack from 1500
to 6000, 3 successive all inn wins from 1500 to 12000 and so on.
To make things a bit more realistic, let’s assume that you win half
the chips you need to win the tournament by making your opponent fold
(i.e no show down). In this case the number of successive all ins
needed to win is reduced by 1 for each of the tournament durations
shown above.
I have chosen the following scenarios that IMO cover the typical all in situations you will experience during a tournament.
The simple reference calculation
Setting probability calculations aside and assuming all the players
in the tournament (including yourself) have an equal chance of winning
it, you will win a tournament with x registered players 1 out of x
times. This means you will win a 100 player tournament 1 out of 100
times, a 200 player tournament 1 out of 200 times and so on. Obviously
you should aim higher than this otherwise your bankroll will hit zero
in no time.
1st scenario: On a roll
- You have an 80% probability of winning all your hands.
- If for example you need to win 3 successive all ins to win the
tournament, the probability of winning it is 0,8*0,8*0,8 =
0,5 corresponding to 1 out of 2 tournaments.
2nd scenario: Coinflip
- You have a 50% probability of winning all your hands.
3rd scenario: Underdog
- You have a 30% probability of winning all your hands.
4th scenario: Realistic?
- 20% of your hands you are underdog (30% probability)
- 40% of your hands you have a coinflip (50% probability)
- 40% of your hands you are favorite (80% probability)
The table below summarizes the probability calculations for the 4 scenarios:
| Duration [hours] |
Reference
win rate
[1 out of ..]
|
On a roll
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
Coinflip
win rate
[1 out of ..]
|
Underdog
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
Realistic
win rate
[1 out of..]
|
| 1 |
9 |
2 |
8
|
37
|
na
|
| 2 |
60 |
3 |
32
|
412
|
16
|
| 3 |
140 |
4 |
64
|
1372
|
28
|
| 4 |
340 |
5 |
128
|
4572
|
50
|
| 5 |
680 |
6 |
256
|
15242
|
87
|
| 6 |
1110 |
7 |
512
|
50805
|
152
|
Interestingly, it turns out that in all but one scenario (the
underdog) your tournament win rate is significantly larger than the
simple reference calculation. In conclusion I think I have successfully
managed to give a qualified estimate of the probabilities of winning
online poker tournament. In my next article I will try to make some use
of the numbers I have come up with. An obvious approach would be to
calculate the expected return on investment (ROI) for each of the
scenarios listed above.
I would greatly appreciate any comments on the math and final numbers.
You could be posting your articles on the Poker Bankroll Blog. Read all about it here.
|